Sunday 11 March 2012, 1.01am HKT
(Updated 11 March 2012 to fix typos and errant phraseology)
9.17pm local time / 14°C (57°F) windy and overcast
AND RATTA has decided to delay her resignation until Monday or Tuesday next week, for the sake of earning two more days’ wages.
She was to have called it quits this morning.
There’ll be two more new hired hands coming in next week, so Ratta also wanted to make sure the new guns get settled in.
Now that’s what I can be responsible-minded.
That’s why Ratta — and not them lot — have been put in charge of high-end luxury sportscars worth millions of dollars at her previous workplace.
Advisory: This will hopefully be the last of my totally angry, totally emotional, totally out-of-order, totally vicious and totally brain-baffling post — quite frankly, even I have had enough of this angry crap.
* * *
I’m not emotional
— and don’t you say I am either
I have a couple of highly emotional reactions about her workplace.
I too can be arrogant, establishmentarian, Tory (conservative), disciplinarian, prescriptivist — choose the words you like best (as Marc Antony said to Cleopatra) — especially to those peasants.
Pay attention! Class is in session!
You won’t even allow Ratta to answer calls on her own mobile phone.
Your workplace is an office. It isn’t a construction site or a railyard where answering phone calls could be dangerous.
Even some prisons have payphones and allow un-effing-restricted phone access by convicts.
Tell me exactly what kind of place you’re running, or you leave.
Your goddamn job is to teach young kids. F@#king learn your manners.
This is your principal job. You do this, or you leave.
Your website is a disgrace to the online community.
Your ‘professional’ organisation cannot even manage the simple task of putting in the right materials into the right webpage.
Your English-language blog page (based on your ‘en_’ URL) is f@#king entirely in Chinese, written by your ‘principal’ in poor bloody Chinese grammar and poor bloody Chinese diction.
By the way, when you’re head of an educational establishment for preteens, your proper title is headmistress, you fat, smelly runt.
This is your principal online task for your website. You do this properly, or you leave the online sphere (or be put out of it).
You are mistaken. You are not professionals because you are not a Professional.
A ‘Professional’ is a person who is trained and/or practising in the Professions.
Classically, there were only three: divinity, medicine and law — the so-called ‘Learned Professions.’
Today, architecture, engineering and (believe it or not) plumbing have been added into the Principal Professions.
A ‘Profession’ is defined as a vocation founded upon specialised educational training, the purpose of which is to supply objective counsel and service to others, for a direct and definite compensation, wholly apart from expectation of other business gain.*
* Paragraph 123 of “Architect Services” (Chapter 7) of a United Kingdom Competition Commission report dated 8 November 1977, quoting a New Statesman article dated 21 April 1917 by Sidney Webb and Beatrice Webb. This definition is applicable worldwide to a greater or lesser extent.
The main milestones** that mark an occupation being identified as a profession are:—
- It became a full-time occupation
- The first training school was established
- The first university school was established
- The first local association was established
- The first national association was established
- The codes of professional ethics were introduced
- State or national licensing laws were established
** Perks, R.W. (1993). Accounting and Society. London: Chapman & Hall, ISBN 0412473305. Page 2.
Even the thoroughly brain-damaged Wikipedia does NOT even include educationistas in the lineup of Professionals:—
- Actuaries (i.e. insurance accountants)
- Advocates (i.e. barristers a.k.a. trial lawyers)
- Archivists (does not include librarians)
- Chefs (does not fulfil criteria 5–7, thus does not qualify as a Profession as described above)
- Diplomats (career diplomats only)
- Engineers (includes electricians)
- Financial analysts (who are now too big to bail out)
- Journalists (even yellow hacks)
- Lawyers (i.e. solicitors a.k.a. non-trial lawyers)
- Pharmacists (but not pharmacologists)
- Philosophers (does not fulfil criteria 5–7, thus does not qualify as a Profession as described above)
- Physicians (i.e. non-surgical doctors)
- Professors (only full sitting professors on tenure)
- Scientists (does not fulfil criteria 5–7, thus does not qualify as a Profession as described above)
- Social workers
- Surgeons (i.e. butchering doctors)
I am a Professional by training and qualification and general recognition.
Your work is not professional because you are not a Professional. This is your actual social and work status. You accept it, or you leave.
As you are not a Professional, I have no interest whatsoever in entertaining your unsubstantiated un-Professional opinions, which are worthless for my Professional purposes.
(Notwithstanding the foregoing, some of my esteemed readers are professional (and Professional) teachers and educationists, and I should hope they too object to your brand of professionalism in education.)
You refused to even speak to your new hired hands, even for something as simple and innocuous as casual chitchat.
Ratta sits around in the office with absoeffinglutely none of the usual office conversation happening.
If you are a jobhunter, this should raise all your red flags about a problematic workplace.
If you are an employer with a workplace like that, you are part of the problem of running a problematic workplace and not the solution.
Your principal job is to run a comfortable, on-going business for profits. I too run a business, comfortable enough, as profitable as it could humanly be. You are to provide a proper workplace with no undue stress for your employees, or you leave.
Your co-workers won’t even talk to each other while dining together at lunchtime.
Red flag. Clearly these people have deep-seated psychological problems.
Untalkativeness or refusal to have social interaction is a strong indicator of high sexual frustration and psychologically traumatised personalities. (I know: my first degree was in psychology and statistics.)
Basically, you need to see a doctor at the first opportunity because I srsly believe the children under your care are under threat by your general pattern of behaviour.
Frankly, I would prefer to put you down like a sick dog with a Smith & Wesson .44 Magnum myself, but I understand from my legal training that would be slightly illegal in any jurisdiction.
Your lunchtime or whatever-the-hell break is when you’re supposed to be yourself. You do that, or your leave.
You deliberately and purposefully stretch things out in your teaching to the children so as to gain maximum possible revenue.
Your ‘company’ provides English-language tuition to very young children as a crammer (AmE: tuition school). But you also prolong the tuition on purpose in order to milk their over-anxious parents sold on the insane idea that kids could learn to speak English ‘natively’ (they mean ‘to speak like a native’) whilst growing up in a non-English-speaking territory like Hong Kong.
Your principal operating doctrine is that you’re a crammer. A crammer is to provide non-permanent remedial directed teaching to meet a specified need (e.g. examinations). You do that, or you leave.
Your three or four expat education or programme or whatever-the-hell directors have been living in my town only after the 1997 handover.
Unless you’ve been here before or are a belonger by birth or connection, you know jack shite about the Chinese and their children.
Were YOU here when THIS was here?
Then tell me what you know about Hong Kong, please.
In fact, you know bollocks about the Chinese
unless you were here when THIS was here.
* * *
In fact, I’ve a mind just to sue those peasants just for fun and to see if my lawyerings skills are still up to scratch. Harr-harr.
Oh, yeah, for our non-English-speaking cousins, all this is what it means by the English phrase ‘having it in for’ somebody.
© The Naked Listener’s Weblog, 2012. Updated 11 March 2012.
Images: Mobile phone via Schoolnet.lk | Facepalm via c4c | Faucet by the author | Arrogant face via Terra Ferma Media | Girlie chitchat via Glossy Icon | Uncle Sam Shut Up via Psychology Today | Old Hong Kong Flag (public domain) via Wikipedia.
Friday 9 March 2012, 2.09am HKT
11.40pm local time
17°C (63°F) drizzly
RATTA (an alias) has been in her new job exactly three weeks now. Judging from what she tells me earlier tonight, I don’t think she’s a happy bunny there.
The trouble is with the people she “has to work with,” as she knowingly puts it.
It’s not Ratta — I know her too well, and she gets along perfect with everyone.
* * *
Turns out the people there are really arrogant, heartless and bloodyminded.
I’ll just relay what Ratta told me in short, conclusive form just to show you how WTF her new employer and co-workers are turning out to be.
- A morass of ‘products’ (tuition courses) that fit into three sheets of A3 size paper (11½ x 16½ inches, or 29.7 x 42 cm).
- The course listings have been organised (by others) in quite a chaotic way, or at least not very organised one.
- There are too many women employees (over 80%).
- Most of the employees are under 25 years old (over 80%).
- Ratta could notice (even with one eye shut) that EVERYBODY there dislikes to explain the work system or anything else to anyone, not just to her.
- There is an expectation in the company that every new employee within a day or two of being hired to fully 100% absorb, digest, understand, appreciate, regurgitate, etc — choose the words you like best — whatever the hell had been badly explained to him or her the first time round (and the only time).
- Any new employee is expected (nay, required) to say the ‘correct’ words on the go-get when conversing with customers (the parents) or handling enquiries.
You can’t ask a question
In one incident, Ratta was being shown the ropes to doing something by a co-worker. Ratta asked the co-worker to clarify a point. The co-worker at once went poe-faced but pretended to be nice. Then Ratta got her arse hauled into the super’s office.
(I wasn’t there to witness it, naturally, but I trust Ratta’s word on it mainly because I know really well and she’s rather good at noticing these things. Had I been there, as a ‘next-level’ sort of guy myself, a punch in that co-worker’s gob would’ve been my response.)
Jesus H. Christ, is it too much to ask for a slight clarification?!?
You have to be perfect
Another incident: Another supervisor asked Ratta how she would answer an enquiry about a new enrolment.
“I’ll say I just do a quick/small assessment first,” Ratta said what her response would be. That sounds all right, doesn’t it? Sounds all right to me even if I were running on lawyer mode.
But, NO, the supervisor launched on Ratta, telling her, “No! You cannot use the word ‘small’ in your answer.”
Would be f@#king nice to be told beforehand, woudn’t it?!!
There you have it. If you utter one single word ‘wrong’ (that is, not in their spiel script), your arse is unceremoniously hauled in front of the super for a pretend-to-be-nice-and-understanding drubbing whose words leave you in no doubt what could happen to you next.
* * *
Points 5, 6 and 7 really got up my nose. They really got my juices for the vicious going. There are lots of companies and lots of people like that in Hong Kong. No wonder when Hong Kong was ‘given back’ to China, nobody lifted a finger to help us.
Those are exactly the kind of conduct that earned Hongkongers the reputation of being treacherous and two-timing (best described by the Chinese colloquialism 反骨 faan gwut, to invert the bones, or turning the bones inside out).
I will not apologise for saying that. I mean it. I don’t like saying things like that, not about my own people or about anyone else. If you’ve lived long enough and have been to or lived in as many places as I have, you’ll know what I’m saying about Hongkongers.
* * *
This place is probably the Hong Kong version of The War Against Terror (TWAT) in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Jesus H. Christ! these people are in the education sector.
Jesus H. Christ! these people clearly don’t know what the fuck they’re doing.
Jesus H. Christ! these people are psychopaths.
We bloody well appreciate that your eyes are constantly on the bottom line in an expensive town like Hong Kong were the rent is skyhigh and choices are near zero.
We bloody well appreciate everyone has a sales quota and it’s hard to keep it rolling, given our tougher business conditions caused by psychopaths in power.
We bloody well appreciate that new employees need some time (certainly effing more than three weeks!) to get used to your f@#king brain-dead, money-grubbing, cash-gouging system clearly based on that psychotic Tiger Mother shite.
We bloody well appreciate this new employee had never farkin’ worked in the education sector.
We bloody fuggin’ well appreciate your other employees are young (maybe too young) to appreciate that, to recall Ratta’s own words:—
“…all these women, all young, single and childrenless, clumped together just don’t seem to realise that women don’t always understand how a man, a father, any parent, would see things.”
Jesus H. Christ, even those among us who have interrogated criminals before expect them to ask back questions or be flummoxed once in a while about their own details!
Remind us about Ratta
I might not have mentioned this before, but Ratta used to work for a major Italian luxury sportscar manufacturer. She was in charge of a pair of high-end sportscars that were worth a staggering HK$9 million (US$1.16 million or £734,000) together. She knew everything there was to know (technically or otherwise) about those sportscars. Even ardent fans knew less than she does about them.
If I had a chance, my question to her employer:—
- Could any of your employees be trusted with even touching products costing that much? No? There’s your answer then.
If I could have it my way
So now Ratta is planning to restart her jobhunt yet again.
Right now, I have in mind to draw up a Litigation Risk Assessment for Ratta for:
- poor treatment of employee
- being given misleading information as to the nature of her job and of the expectations of her work
- party or parties, jointly and severally, carrying on a pattern of behaviour or conduct that on the balance of probability knowingly or unknowingly is leading or causing to lead to an unspecified and/or unspecifiable state of mental anguish in Ratta
Jesus H. Christ, these people clearly are ripe to be taught a lesson. And since they are in the education sector, they should be quite amenable to teachable lessons, don’t you think?
What can we expect in children when they’re taught by people like THAT?!!
Again, I remind you all:—
“If you tolerate this, your children will be next.” (English proverb)
* * *
Comment, muthareader. Will you leave one?
© The Naked Listener’s Weblog, 2012.
Tuesday 6 March 2012, 5.25pm HKT
11.49am local time / 25°C (77°F) sunny and humid
SOME OF YOU
callous caring readers have asked for updates about Råtta (an alias), whom I mentioned in previous posts (“Ratta’s bother” and “Do this if you should get fired: A lifehack exclusive“).
I have good, bad, indifferent and what-the-eff news about her. Try not to snigger and giggle.
By the way, let’s now instead call her Ratta (with no å, the Ångstrom) because it’s one helluva chore to write Råtta.
The good news
Ratta’s landed a job!
You may remember Ratta is fiftysomething, not an age that makes for easy jobhunting nowadays.
She started her new job on 23 February, just three weeks after being made redundant at the old place on 29 January.
During that time, she went to no less than 20 job interviews of varying quality and what-the-effness that I reckon will be far too brickshattingly unbelievable to relate here.
That works out around one job interview a day. In my book, a person like her has dedication, stamina, disciplined and being thorough. Ratta can thumb her nose at the old employers, who can royally suck eggs (and a couple of other ‘things’) for giving Ratta her marching orders.
What’s her job now? We’ll get to that a moment.
The indifferent news
Ratta’s son is going to be 18 in a few weeks’ time, and he’s just started part-timing at some minimum-wage, sweatshop bucketslop owned by an internationally well-known American mega-conglomerate ‘catering’ Evil Empire (not McBongo).
It helps to work for an Evil Empire because the wastage of food is quite staggering. At the end of the day, Ratta’s son brings home literally three or four boxes of free food due for binning. The food is perfectly eatable — it’s just Imperial Policy not to resell today’s food tomorrow. Around 30 or 40 boxfuls (or 200 lbs or 90 kg) of this perfectly eatable food are thrown away every day.
Every little bit helps to shave the grocery bills.
The bad news
Ratta has a sister — let’s call her Fishtail.
Fishtail is 50-ish too, and she’s starting to get the same sordid aggro Ratta got just before sendoff.
Fishtail’s ‘managers’ complained that she wasn’t meeting her customer quotas for some time and now making moves to ship her out. Some of the other managers reconsidered and instead gave Fishtail an ultimatum to shape up (quota-wise) within three months, or GTFO.
Fishtail admits she’s the lowest-selling employee in her company — but that’s mainly because her pay grade doesn’t put her in more direct contact with customers. Like Ratta, Fishtail is in sales support — not exactly designed for grabbing sales prospects. Fishtail basically told the managers that three months to meet sales quota is … well … a near-impossible slog, especially given the just-turned-tougher business conditions here in Hong Kong.
So Fishtail rang Ratta up yesterday to say it might be her turn next to look for a job.
The WTF news
You’re gonna farkin’ like this one.
Ratta now works for a tutorial college — for infants and preteens!
You read it right. And if that wasn’t enough of a mindf*ck already, Ratta’s job title is personal education consultant. She’s on three-month probation before becoming staff.
Ratta is too embarrassed to even say her job title out loud. What flamin’ education consultant?!
She left secondary school with only two or three subjects passed. The older kids (roughly 10 to 12 years old) at the tuition centre are already better ‘qualified’ (in grades and the number of subjects passed) than Ratta herself!
That’s the state of our education sector here. It capitalises on the anxiety of parents who feel their babies must receive a constant piss-stream of anal-retentive structured tuition and drillwork in order to be able to speak 12.932 languages ‘natively’ (as opposed to ‘like a native’) and achieve Grade A’s in 23.8 school subjects before they hit 10.34 years old.
You know it, I know it, everybody else round the world knows it, but these parents obviously have never even heard of kids will become stale when overloaded with study and activities.
Just one single example from Ratta will suffice:—
Kid bumped himself in the crotch in the school washroom, wept and cried, got attended to by the staff, but no damage done. Asked why he was fidgeting all afternoon, the kid said he was tired from the morning picnic trip. And he’ll have to be in dancing lessons later the same day after this place. The kid is five years old.
I can’t stop laughing (in a sardonically sneering way) while I write this.
This is exactly the kind of unnecessary sphincter-expanding butthurt your kid has to live and suffer through for the next 15 years if you’re sold on that maddening craze called the Tiger Mother Syndrome now sweeping the world over.
Motherf*cker, did you tiger it?
I will not apologise for saying this, but that is the f@#king psychopathic crap propounded by that American-born Philippine Chinese lawyer/professor personage by the name of Amy Chua in her book “Battle Hymn of the Tiger Mother“ (Penguin, 2011, 240 pages).
“Tiger Mother” is a parenting memoir of how Chua raised her two daughters (both at Harvard now).
The Wall Street Journal picked up on the spiel and even got Chua to write her own piece there (“Why Chinese Mothers Are Superior,” 8 Jan 2011, WSJ). That unleashed the fearsome terror that book contains on the congenitally brain-damaged (or 80% of the world population) who thought it’s the best thing since sliced bollocks.
Frankly, between you and me, “Tiger Mother” would cause you to:—
- EITHER think it’s the cure-all to handling your brats (if you’re brainless)
- OR send shivers down your proverbial spine (if you have half a brain left)
- OR buy the book and treat it as a training manual to milk cash off delusional parents with self-induced offspring anxieties (if you have a full brain)
Excuse my blasphemy, but Jesus Christ! man, I’ve never read such frighteningly neurotic stuff in my life before. The things people do to children. Stop concentrating on her well-formed English locution and pay attention to her ideas. My personal belief is to get children to achieve as much as humanly possible, aim high, shoot from above the belt, and enjoy the finite years on Earth. I’m no slacker and am not disposed to tolerate slacking. But “Tiger Mother” goes too far.
Realise there’s something important in my second point above. If you’ve bought into the spiel, you’re in fact producing, training, conditioning, inculcating, imbibing — choose the words you like best — a generation of psychopaths. Overachievers are psychopaths — you know this, you must do — because when you the parent is old and decrepit, slowly shutting down, no longer achieving so well, you no longer measure up to your kids’ overwrought expectations of your achievement. Kids who are like that, they’ll ditch the by-now-underachiever you one fine day in your geriatric hour of need. I’ve seen it happen before, first-hand.
Uptight and untidy
Listen, not to put too fine a point on things, what does […]
Sorry, I’ve deleted/censored this part because I think I was being a bit too blunt, and just a bit too racially motivatedly racist.
But I will say Chua is as Great Lakes Yankee as you could possibly get. I had a highly Westernised Chinese mother, and Mum was nowhere near as Westernised as Chua. The stuff Chua wrote, I saw nothing Chinese. So I don’t know where Chua got the phantasmagorical idea that she’s ‘a Chinese mother.’
I don’t think she’s putting in enough effort to achieve the requisite grade in Chinese motherhood. Such an underachiever. Nil marks.
Not exactly [censored]
[This part deleted/censored]
[Some parts deleted/censored]
If “Tiger Mother” is a battle hymn, then I remind you, those who live by the sword, dies by the sword. Namsayin’?
I happen to think the kids at Ratta’s place are having their childhood years being slowly snuffed out of them by their very own loving, caring, EQ-sensitive, socially aware, socioculturally dynamic, delusional, neurotically obsessive parents with ching-chong chowmein testicles for brains.
© The Naked Listener’s Weblog, 2012.
Wednesday 1 February 2012, 9.50pm HKT
(This finale is a bit late because of being held up by work.)
When you’re fiftysomething like Råtta, losing your job is no joke, especially in a raw capitalist
toilet city like Hong Kong.
We give you two final protips and then we’ll take questions.
* * *
AN ‘ALPHA’ PROTIP
When you’re on the chopping block, so to speak, develop an ability to “have it inside you” to “have it in for them” to save your skin.
They’re hosing you down* and giving you the finger**, and that ain’t a shower and a massage.
* In the American journalistic meaning of ‘to try to stop people from believing in something that may cause problems,’ of course. But you’re free to interpret the phrase according to its more ‘usual’ meaning, namsayin’?
** Meaning a finger pointing at the exit door, but you’re free to interpret the word in its ‘usual’ meaning.
You get one life, and one life is all you got. Why should other people get away with your bad behaviour that you are too gormless to carry out?
Yours truly here is actually a Type A personality, though you probably wouldn’t think so looking at the way I mostly carry on. Many crap situations just aren’t worth the firepower, and not worth ‘the stretch’ in the brig to take things to the next level. I’ve learnt from a young age that polite aggro hurts a helluva lot more than brute-force hacking.
I just lurve seeing people with either faces that have gone pale or clenched fists with white knuckles. Heaven knows others have caused me to have both plenty of times.
But if you let crap people tread all over you (or anyone else), the our gods/Jesus/Buddha/name your favourite deity died for nothing.
Nothing personal, it’s just karma.
THE ‘BETA’ PROTIP
Youthfulness is always desirable, especially in old age. (English adage)
Another thing — are you good for your age? There’s an old saying that you should keep yourself in tiptop form even at 60 because you’ll never know when you’ll have to crank up firepower in competition with the young’uns. If you’re a bleeding physical wreck, then life’s gonna rough you up.
Develop an ability to make yourself youthful — even if it’s just doing small tricks to your overall looks. Look smart and lively. I don’t even remember how many times I’ve said this.
To make yourself look a few years younger isn’t trying to ‘flash’ or ‘glam’ or about some crazy psychological hankering for one’s lost youth.
Honestly speaking, at age 50 or more, you’d probably have forgotten nearly everything about your own youth.
We’re living in the 21st century now. You’re not in Kansas anymore. Looking more youthful is a practical equaliser. I’m telling you, man, ‘old’ is denigrated as society’s flotsam. Oldies are practically and instantaneously replaceable by all manners of young cattle now overpopulating our sordid little world.
Try these for size (from easiest to hardest to carry out):
- Change (or merely adjust) your overall wardrobe (easiest)
- Have gorgeous locks (depends if you have hair left)
- Dye your hair 50% closer to ‘natural’ colour (or blondify it if all grey)
- Eat for a beautiful smile
- Protect your body from sun damage
- Form healthier habits
- Keep your brain sharp: play anti-ageing brain games
- Learn new technology, even if you hate and detest it
- Learn expert makeup (and makeover) tips
- Understand health news and shift through the BS about anti-ageing
- Create your own anti-ageing product arsenal
- Love your heart (hardest)
Average lifespan worldwide keeps rising. Company retirement age constantly lowering. The government keeps jacking up the social security retirement age. Ageism more and more pronounced by the year. Prices rising, incomes falling, jobs disappearing. Ad infinitum, ad flamin’ nauseum.
The worldwide average births-to-deaths ratio is 100 to 1.2 — just how are YOU going to feed, clothe and house your 50-year-old self over the next 15 to 40 years when there’s 100 babies born for every one person + one leg dying, huh?
What else, what bloody else, I ask you, could anybody do other than try and look a bit more sprightly?
Nothing personal, it’s just me.
I said ‘younger,’ not brain-damaged…
* * *
What the hell are you so worked up about, man?
Are you 50-ish, with a mortgage still to run for 15 years, with a miseducated kid who’s too old to spend little but too young to work? If not, then you can’t even imagine Råtta’s predicament.
‘You would rapidly change your mind if it happened to you.’
But businesses are not in the charity business. Businesses must have freedom to hire and fire as they see fit.
Are you asking a question or just stating the obvious, Captain Kangaroo?
This isn’t about freedom to hire and fire, nitwit. It’s about how to face immediate termination of employment.
Get a job yourself! You’ve obviously never worked before.
Why the advice for causing unpleasantness? They said they’re going to pay her entitlements. You’re teaching people to cause trouble.
My father once wrote in his book, “Hong Kong is the American Dream that America had always wanted.”
Translated, it means Hong Kong is 10 times more capitalist (and capitalistic) than the good ole’ USA. Employers are legally free to cause and watch you squirm, writhe in pain, rot and die.
Our esteemed government compounds the harshness by invariably siding with employers at the expense of employees on the excuse that employers are ‘investors in the economy.’
Translated, that means everybody else is just fodder or flotsam. (That’s insulting, srsly.) And then ‘they’ complain why people are no longer obedient and submissive or ‘know their place.’
The Labour Department issues various guidebooks on employment matters, but they’re mostly useless. They lift big chunks of the law word for word so unless you’re legally trained, you don’t know what you’re reading.
Our phantasmagorical Labour Tribunal actually bars the use of the phrase ‘non-payment of wages’ (an internationally used term) and instead invents the more innocuous phrase ‘delayed wage payment.’ I actually know people who’ve had wages ‘delayed’ for literally 10 years. Our statute of limitations on civil claims is six years — Sayonara! to those ‘delayed’ wages, baby!
If something simple like that happens, what kind of help can we expect?
Unless you live here, you pseudo-liberal-leaning neoconservative fascist commie, you know fo’shiz jackass about being out of work here.
Wot now with Råtta?
I hate to be blunt, but when you hit 50, life ain’t worth living, job-wise speaking.
Råtta’s 50-something and highly unlikely to find another job that pays HK$14,000 a month (US$1,805 or £1,150).
(See what I mean? These people just don’t make an impact on any kind of bottom line, not even after factoring in that holier-than-holy costs of employment
Cost of employment … costlier than the
golden parachutes for your managers?
Did she know this was coming?
Since the company closed the downtown office last year, Råtta said she felt things wouldn’t be turning out right for her. Hard to explain. The bosses didn’t speak to her in their usual manner. Job duties became odder and odder. The ‘feel’ at work was all wrong, she said.
Truth be told, I had this bizarre dream three or four nights ago about myself getting the pink slip — a job I had in real life 15 years ago. My hunch: the dream was about Råtta’s job instead.
(Yes, I sometimes dream about other people and their goings-on, even when some of these other people aren’t necessarily close to me. Peculiar that, isn’t it?)
Who’s taking over her place?
Gunga Din for all we care.
Råtta’s company is profitable, but the holding company up top is bleeding like an over-menstruating woman on blood thinners.
(So profits are for corporate menstruation…)
Seems like Queenie (a new hire) will be shoehorned into Råtta’s job. But Råtta said Queenie’s getting on in years (nearing 50) and probably won’t be able to handle the ever-increasing (and essentially pointless) workload generated by the four infighting brand and sales managers. The Old Man doesn’t give a toss because he’s way past retirement (70-something) and planning to live the sweet life someplace else.
Methinks the same fate will befall on Queenie, and that too ain’t nice.
* * *
A FAVOUR, IF YOU PLEASE
If anyone is interested in hiring Råtta, contact me on this blog
and I’ll send you her details.
* * *
Please leave comments for Råtta’s sake.
© The Naked Listener’s Weblog, 2012.
Images: Dislike button via Digital Trends ♦ White Knuckles (modified) via XyFace ♦ Looking younger via Garmahis ♦ Employer’s finger via NITP ♦ Tips via The Independent ♦ Pink slip via Homeowners Insurance.
Wednesday 1 February 2012, 4.51am HKT
So Råtta’s got the sack yesterday on the highly popular excuse of cost-cutting — which I don’t believe for one goddamn minute, even with my highly fragmentary understanding of how her company works.
We continue with more protips on how to face an immediate termination of employment when there’s pronounced ageism in the jobmarket and you’re 50-something, lumbered with a 15-year-long mortgage and a badly schooled half-grownup kid who can’t enter the workforce yet.
(It’s not a happy story, but please do leave comments. For Råtta’s sake if not mine.)
… but only if it loves you too
* * *
It’s not meant to be usable, idiot
3. Råtta was promised a reference letter in due course, spelling out her ‘duties’ etc.
Remark: Some employers (yours truly included) are just plain mean and nasty. They compose a reference letter that basically says everything wrong about you without being defamatory — or factual. You end up with an unusable reference letter. Don’t let this happen to you.
Example (as happened to me before):
“[The Naked Listener] was employed by our Company between 5 BC and AD 375 in the position of Inquisitor Captain-General. His duties were [etc] and he has shown to have a knowledge of English…”
A knowledge of your mother!
I’ve been speaking English since before your miserable existence on Earth even started! You, as a native English speaker, couldn’t even speak native English.
See what I mean about an unusable reference letter?
Protip: This is why I keep telling people till I’m blue in face to actually draft up a reference letter or jobsheet soon after starting employment. Add in job details etc as you go along. We all getting fired sooner or later, and when that one fine day comes, you’ll at least have something to show what you’ve actually f@#king done for the ingrates. You cannot, must not, should not rely on Human Resources after the fact — they’re mostly too incompetent to work out their own jobsheet because of the office infighting they’re usually involved in. I speak this as an employer myself, you stupid runt. Nothing personal, just a business decision.
Protip: They’re NOT going to honour the crap reference letter! It’s only documentary evidence that you’ve worked there before — nothing more, you moron.
They’re just promises
4. Råtta said the termination pay will be credited to her bank account by [date].
Protip: If your continued or prolonged presence is somehow ‘unrequired’ for them, then their continued or prolonged termination procedure is likewise ‘unrequired’ for you. Your request for immediate fulfilment of termination entitlements is YOUR reasonable step to ensure THEIR efficient tying up of loose ends and yourselves’ mutual cooperativeness. Nothing personal, just a responsible business decision. Karma’s a bitch, right?
Protip: The moment you get your pink slip, they’re no longer your employers. They owe you a debt, legally speaking. They gave you only a verbal promise of termination payment, etc. A company that requires your immediate departure whilst apparently able to pay termination entitlements cannot reasonably be expected on the balance of probability to fulfil promises made to you. Request for immediate fulfilment of termination entitlements is reasonable under the circumstances. I do believe it’s called quid pro quo, wasn’t it? Nothing personal, it’s just responsible legal practice.
Protip: Whilst you accept their promise at face value, you are taking circumstantially reasonable steps to ensure the entitlements are received and not just receivable. The fact of requiring your immediate departure can be construed as their possible attempt to delay or avoid (or even inability) to pay entitlements, even whilst measured against your admittedly incomplete understanding of the company’s overall internal situation. Nothing personal, just responsible business decision. Karma’s a bitch, right?
‘Don’t make trouble’ is rubbish
5. Råtta didn’t want to cause a ‘scene’ by hanging around the office any longer than necessary.
Remark: No kidding — as if anybody wants to hang around for senti-bloody-mental reasons. Don’t ferkin’ make it easy! Telling you to piss off right away is itself on balance of probability an action designed to give you a hard time. Stop defending crap people. Aggro can be done politely too.
Protip: Ditch the ‘please don’t make trouble’ mentality in situations like Råtta’s. You can’t be THIS stupid, can you? You’re being hanged, drawn and quartered! Not asking you to be rude or unpleasant, but realise you owe them nothing now. They’re giving you The Finger, so you should also to them.
Protip/remark: Their requiring your immediate termination is suggestive of a perception on their part that your continued presence is somehow undesirable. Otherwise, there should be no reason for immediate departure. And that immediate termination can be regarded as a defamatory label against you. Nothing personal, just a responsible legal perspective.
Protip/remark: Their payability of termination entitlements in lieu of notice is consistent with their possessing an ability to keep you on employment until the 30 days’ notice runs out. Otherwise, this reinforces the reason given above. Nothing personal, just responsible legal logic.
* * *
Put in some comments, for Råtta’s sake. It’ll be good for her morale.
Go on to Question Time on Take 3 (finale).
© The Naked Listener’s Weblog, 2012.